The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2002-Oct> msg00142



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: IGP tuning for TE versus MPLS-TE

  • From: "alok" <alok.dube@apara.com>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:26:11 +0530
  • Cc: <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
  • Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 05:33:35 -0500
  • To: "M. ELK" <elkou141061@hotmail.com>

what do u do for "non ip" traffic ;o)
 
can u "TE" it too with IGP tunning?
 
 
 
-rgds
alok
----- Original Message -----
From: M. ELK
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 3:01 PM
Subject: [MPLS-OPS]: IGP tuning for TE versus MPLS-TE

Their is some hot debate previously on this list about an article on MPLS which stated that no need for MPLS ,anyhow the conclusion from this debate was that the writer of such article is clueless .
here is a doc from sprint which state exactly the same :
(guess ,could not state that they are clueless too . also the doc have the cisco logo ) .
 
need not to start another hot debate ,just need U comment on the possibility
and limitation of TE by tuning IGP versus MPLS-TE , any other provider
droped MPLS-TE favoring IGP tunning ? .
 
Brgds

Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband.  Join now! Click Here ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml