Re: IGP tuning for TE versus MPLS-TE

Alok

Guess with tunneling it over IP (ex:GRE) .

For VPN L2 ,sprint proposed solution is GRE and/or L2TPv3 .

Brgds

>From: "alok"

>To: "M. ELK"

>CC:

>Subject: Re: [MPLS-OPS]: IGP tuning for TE versus MPLS-TE

>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:26:11 +0530

>what do u do for "non ip" traffic ;o)

>can u "TE" it too with IGP tunning?

>-rgds

>alok

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: M. ELK

> To: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com

> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 3:01 PM

> Subject: [MPLS-OPS]: IGP tuning for TE versus MPLS-TE

> Their is some hot debate previously on this list about an article on MPLS

>which stated that no need for MPLS ,anyhow the conclusion from this debate

>was that the writer of such article is clueless .

> here is a doc from sprint which state exactly the same :

> http://www.sprintbiz.com/business/resources/resource/SprintCiscoMPLS.pdf

> (guess ,could not state that they are clueless too . also the doc have the

>cisco logo ) .

> need not to start another hot debate ,just need U comment on the

>possibility

> and limitation of TE by tuning IGP versus MPLS-TE , any other provider

> droped MPLS-TE favoring IGP tunning ? .

> Brgds

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------

>--

> Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband. Join now! Click Here -------

>The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

>http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive:

>http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml

The MPLS-OPS Archive