The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2003-Feb> msg00184



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: Fwd: RSVP and LSP Questions

  • From: "john smith" <johnsmith0302@hotmail.com>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 23:15:25 +0530
  • Cc: "MPLS-ops Mailing List" <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
  • Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 13:45:38 -0500
  • To: "Eric Osborne" <eosborne@cisco.com>
  • X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2003 17:26:06.0941 (UTC) FILETIME=[D07CE0D0:01C2DC29]
  • X-Originating-IP: [210.214.115.142]

Thanks for your replies Eric,

Just some clarifications,

> > > We support RSVP-TE ERO.  We support a TE DB based on OSPF and/or ISIS
> > > extensions.
> >
> > what about constraints other than "explicit-route"?
> >
>
> we support the extensions in rfc3209, plus some local constraints.
> see your friendly neighborhood CCO docs (or this really good book I
> head about once..:) ) for more detail.


........on the lines of draft katz-yeung......cum 3209


so lets see now, you support "passing of information on the TE DB via opaque
LSAs, at any given time you know how much of the "bandwidth" is
subscribed...but there is no way as of now to "set the upper limit" on the
bandwidth...am i correct?

i did see the automatic-reservation mechanism on your site, quite
interesting...is that what you were referring to in the "mean like" amount?

about the other part:

on the other bit.....

 can you please elaborate "all the time"?

how do you ever ensure that the user "never bursts" beyond his capacity ?

 the reservations normally need to be done only at the time of LSP setup.
 (i agree its not a hard limit nor am i asking for the RSVP instance to talk
 to the policer, but i think rate-limiting per VPN at the PE is still
needed)






>
> > so we can have data from TED passing OSPF-TE extensions based on opaque
> > LSAs?
> >
>
> yes.
>
>
>
>
> eric
>
> >
> > >
> > > > > > >2. What's the behavior of RSVP, when it's configured to
constrain &
> > > > > > >reserved a 20 MB? Will it maintain 20MB LSP permanently
regardless
> > the
> > > > > > >traffic usage (no tear down)?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes.  But in at least our implementation, the reservation is
> > > > > control-plane only.  The idea is to build a reservation for
something
> > > > > like 95th percentile of your traffic between two points.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Can you please elaborate?
> > >
> > > Rather than constantly changing a reservation in increments of (say)
> > > 1k all the time based on actual traffic flow, build a TE LSP that
> > > reserves some sort of mean or mean-like amount of bandwidth between
> > > two points.  This is not a vendor-specific thing, it is a network
> > > design thing.
> >
> > can you please elaborate "all the time"?
> >
> > the reservations normally need to be done only at the time of LSP setup.
> > (i agree its not a hard limit nor am i asking for the RSVP instance to
talk
> > to the policer, rate-limiting per VPN at the PE is still needed)
> >
> >
> >
>
> -------
> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
>

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml