The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2003-Jan> msg00053



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: need some mpls feature list for diffrent products !!!!

  • From: "Bruce" <bruce_reid202@hotmail.com>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:28:13 +0530
  • Cc: "aadil k" <routeindia@yahoo.com>, <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
  • Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 03:45:06 -0500
  • To: <jshen@cad.zju.edu.cn>, "Eric Osborne" <eosborne@cisco.com>
  • X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jan 2003 06:50:10.0907 (UTC) FILETIME=[839BE2B0:01C2BD2B]
  • X-Originating-IP: [203.124.140.20]

Hi Aadil and All,

Here is a list of drafts I have.

Would be great if people could share their experience and their support on
the drafts, and add more to the same, it would serve as a recap of all the
drafts out so far and help keep in touch with a "database" of where things
stand as of date:

draft-ietf-mpls-icmp-01.txt
draft-ietf-mpls-arch-06.txt
draft-ietf-mpls-framework-05.txt
draft-ietf-mpls-label-encaps-07.txt
RFC 2702
draft-ietf-isis-traffic-02.txt
 draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic-01.txt
 draft-hsmit-mpls-igp-spf-01.txt
draft-ietf-mpls-label-encaps-07.txt.
RFC 3031 MPLS Architecture
RFC 3032 MPLS Label Stack Encoding
RFC 3036 LDP Specification
RFC 3037 LDP Applicability
RFC 3063 MPLS Loop Prevention Mechanism
RFC 2702 Requirements for Traffic Engineering Over MPLS
RSVP Extensions for MPLS Traffic Engineering
Extensions OSPF and ISIS for MPLS Traffic Engineering.
DiffServ Aware MPLS Traffic Engineering
2547-bis BGP MPLS VPN

I am also interested if there is a proposed standard for RSVP-TE EROs.. are
there any well defined EROs?


-Bruce




----- Original Message -----
From: Jing Shen <jshen@cad.zju.edu.cn>
To: Eric Osborne <eosborne@cisco.com>
Cc: Bruce <bruce_reid202@hotmail.com>; aadil k <routeindia@yahoo.com>;
<mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: [MPLS-OPS]: need some mpls feature list for diffrent products
!!!!


> Hi,
>
> happy new year.
>
>
> >
> > uh....no.  We don't support CR-LDP; never have, never will.  The
> > intserv model to which you refer is more a combination of RSVP+QoS
> > that has not much to do with TE.  But we support rfc3209 for TE
> > signalling, and LDP as well.  Not CR-LDP.
>
> Why not CR-LDP? I've noticed announcement of DiffServ stated that
> research focus should be moved  RSVP-TE, but no detailed explanation.
>
>
> >
> > > 2. CR-LDP is no longer used by the ietf. The workgroup has been closed
> > > mainly due to major issues with the CRLDP draft which can be seen in
the
> > > PPVPN WG archieves.
> > >
>
> Would you please tell me which title covers this in mail list archive of
> that Charter?
>
> thanks
>
> Jing Shen
>
>
>
> State Key Lab of CAD&CG
> ZheJiang University(YuQuan)
> HangZhou, Z.J. 310027
> P.R.China
>
> **********************************************************************
> * The SunShine of life is made up of very little beams which is      *
> *  bright all the time                                               *
> **********************************************************************
>
> -------
> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
>

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml