The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: mpls te question
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:18:30PM -0800, Srikar Mrk wrote: > > hello... > > while trying to configure some basic mpls te topology i have following confusion... > > In a network diagram, > > A ------------ B ------------ C > > if I have a dynamic MPLS TE tunnel from A to C and I am running OSPF and if I am using autoroute announce (using default tunnel metric relative 0) , networks on C are being installed with only tunnel as next hop while I am expecting the routes to be ECMP between tunnel and OSPF next hops because the costs would be the same.. > > am i assuming something wrong...? > Yes; we (as I assume this is a cisco config, from your terminology) never load-share between IGP and TE for the route to the tail. If we did this, you could never control 100% of the A->C traffic with TE, as some of it would always go via IGP. eric > thanks for your time.... > > sincerely, > > srikar > > > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
|
|