The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2003-Jan> msg00108



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: Off-Topic doubt

  • From: Lars Higham <lhigham@yahoo.com>
  • Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 02:17:44 -0800 (PST)
  • Resent-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 06:32:58 -0500
  • To: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com

Also, strict EROs are used when constraint based LSPs
are built using, for example, RSVP and CSPF in order
to build the LSP across a the same path that was
'reserved' using RSVP.

You might use loose EROs when you are manually
building your LSPs and want a balance between control
of the path and resiliency.

Regards,
Lars Higham


--- Joseph Anthony <tonyjoe20002002@yahoo.co.in>
wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> In simple terms, A strict hop must be directly
> connected (that is, adjacent) to the previous node
> in the path. A loose hop is not necessarily directly
> connected to the previous node; whether it is
> directly connected is unknown. 
> 
> One area of usage, which I have come across is while
> configuring TE across multiple OSPF areas on a Cisco
> implementation. You would need to configure an
> explicit path and the path-option would need to
> specify the list of ABRs the tunnel LSP must
> traverse as "loose" hops. 
> Regards, 
> Joe.
> 
>  
> 
> Catch all the cricket action. Download Yahoo! Score
tracker


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml