The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] RE: IP MPLS VPN and Cisco
Hi, many thanks for your answers ! I saw this information in a Juniper training documentation, but it's a bit old (more than one year). I got a paper copy of that document, and I think it's not available on the web. kr, sebastien. -----Original Message----- From: Ajay Simha [mailto:asimha@cisco.com] Sent: mercredi 19 mars 2003 20:44 To: Sebastien.Spas@alcatel.be Cc: Mpls-Ops@Mplsrc. Com; Eric Osborne; Jim Guichard; Robert Raszuk Subject: Re: [MPLS-OPS]: IP MPLS VPN and Cisco On Wed Mar 19 19:28:26 2003, Sebastien.Spas@alcatel.be wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I saw recently a document talking about "limitations" while trying to > do Traffic-Engineering with MPLS VPN. > > > > 1) The LSPs going from PE to PE beeing used for IP VPNs can only be > LDP signaled LSP (LDP messages always follow the IGP shortest path, > then it's not possible to perform any Traffic Engineering which > requires RSVP signalled LSPs) Not true. Which slide are you talking about? Please point me to the source. > > > > 2) Some vendors propose to provision an RSVP signalled LSP between the > 2 P closest to the PEs, and traffic-engineer that RSVP LSP. Then, the > traffic is processed through the initial LDP LSP, then thourgh that > RSVP LSP using label stacking. If you have RSVP-TE between 'P' devices you need to run LDP on the top - to preserve the inner LDP label OR turn off PHP if not the tail of the TE tunnel sees the BGP/VPN label and drops the packet. > > > > > > Do you know if this is still the case with latest versions of Cisco > and Juniper equipment ? Speaking for Cisco, for a while now IOS allows you have BGP-VPN over TE with no LDP enabled. -ajay > > > > > > kind regards, > > sebastien. ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
|
|