The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: MPLS aware NICs
For that matter I dont even see what the PE does why not simply stack VLANs /or/use ethernet in ethernet and do away with the PE routers? --- sthaug@nethelp.no wrote: > > Let's say you want to do policy routing on your > edge, redirecting some > > packets to one or more servers located at a > central server farm. To > > do this you need tunnels from the edge routers to > these servers. Why > > not use MPLS tunnels? The servers will have to > terminate the tunnels > > no matter what protocol is used. But they don't > have to do any > > forwarding, and they don't really have to > participate in the routing > > exchange. > > > > I'd say that popping a label is much preferred to > unwrapping ipsec or > > gre or whatever, even if you don't qualify as a > router ;-) > > I don't see what this gives you compared to > terminating MPLS at a > suitable PE router and using VLANs the rest of the > way towards the > servers? > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no > > ------- > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml > Archive: > http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml > ___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
|
|