The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] RE: Question on closed loop
Sylvia, > If one can represnt the routing algorithm's decision > process as a function F(input_at_time_t) at each node, > and > a. has the ability to modify the input function(may > not be impulse) > b. choose the function F (which is the same at each > node) Am afraid i missed this one. > > can one do away with principals like Count to Infinity > in RIP and get a way that the topology will converge > to stability when any input is applied at R1? > I think we have already come out with solutions which obviates the need for principals like count to infinity, etc. As a consequence we have now done away with a protocol like RIP. > This is the problem defination. Frankly, i coudnt get the problem at all that you are trying to address. > > --- "M. ELK" <elkou141061@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Spice > > > > What is the (network) idea/point behind your > > question ?? > > Could U pls explain . > > > > Brgds > > > > >From: Spice Sylvia <falsesylvia@yahoo.co.uk> > > >To: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com > > >Subject: [MPLS-OPS]: Question on closed loop > > >Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:26:29 +0000 (GMT) > > > > > > > > >Given a closed loop topology, say a transistor > > circuit > > >with feedback, is it possible that an impulse input > > >will not produce oscillations? > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml |
|