The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2004-Jan> msg00017



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: Re: Voice over MPLS

  • From: Eric Osborne <eosborne@cisco.com>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:36:05 -0500
  • Cc: Rajiv Asati <rajiva@cisco.com>, Eric Osborne <eosborne@cisco.com>, mpls <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>, dh8@pobox.com
  • Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:02:58 -0500
  • To: Sunil Menon K <k_sunilmenon@rediffmail.com>
  • User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
  • X-GPG-Fingerprint: 6412 0836 E440 B3EA 980C 4951 611E 1819 2E71 8562

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 09:55:36AM -0000, Sunil Menon K wrote:
> Hi all,
> Just to add on Dennis's model,
> 1)At CE, classify and mark the traffic.
> 2)PE just perform ip to exp and prioritization of traffic and 

and police CE traffic, if the CE is unmanaged and untrusted.




eric

> 3)P(typically Core)configure handling,ie...define queues and set drop precedence using any of the congestion avoidance mechanisms.
> 
> Please suggest if there could be a better way to implement this
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> Sunil
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 Rajiv Asati wrote :
> >Dennis,
> >
> >>have to.  The issue we have is that we don't want to pre-allocate tunnels that may not be utilized.  This is the reason we're looking into the Automatic Bandwidth Adjustment.  Any reccomendations?
> >
> >I think you meant the pre-allocation of BW, not tunnels.
> >Keep in mind that the TE tunnels have to be pre-established, whether used or not.
> >
> >Now, leaving MPLS TE aside for a moment, from the QoS perspective, if we use simple QoS policy, then the BW allocated for the Voice traffic will indeed be used by the other traffic in the absence of voice-traffic. In other words, the BW reserved for a certain traffic will not be locked-in for that traffic only.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Rajiv
> >
> >At 10:38 PM 1/7/2004, Dennis J. Hartmann wrote:
> >>     Is the MPLS TE Automatic Bandwidth Adjustment feature compatible with the Guaranteed Bandwidth feature?  I'm looking at an implementation on a 7301 router.  On the CE - PE link, we'll be setting the DSCP to EF (using the Priority Queue) for all of the Voice over IP and using WDRR (Weighted Deficit Round Robin) as a congestion avoidance mechanism.  We'd rather not use Traffic Engineering, but we will if we have to.  The issue we have is that we don't want to pre-allocate tunnels that may not be utilized.  This is the reason we're looking into the Automatic Bandwidth Adjustment.  Any reccomendations?
> >>
> >>Sincerely,
> >>
> >>Dennis Hartmann
> >
> >
> >-------
> >The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> >Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> >Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml