The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2004-Jan> msg00075



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: Re: OSPF and IS IS

  • From: Jean Philippe Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:33:11 -0500
  • Cc: <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
  • Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:16:48 -0500
  • To: "Piotr Marecki" <piotr.marecki@tdcinternet.pl>
  • X-Sender: jvasseur@wells.cisco.com

At 04:51 PM 1/26/2004 +0100, Piotr Marecki wrote:

> >
> > > 2.Does IS IS hold an edge over OSPF in anyway for Traffic
> > > Engineering implementations?
> >
> > There are some features that tend to ship for ISIS first and OSPF in
> > the next release, but if you aren't concerned with bleeding-edge, then
> > no.
> >
> >
>
>Which is not always true unfortunately .Latest example is diffserv aware TE
>implementation
>introduced in junos 6.2 .Only protocol so far supported to distribute ds-TE
>information is OSPF.
>Bad luck...

Eric's point was just to say that some features may be implemented first in 
one IGP or another indifferently ... this was just an example

JP.

>regards
>
>Piotr Marecki
>
>
>
>-------
>The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
>Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml