The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: Re: OSPF and IS IS
> > > >Which is not always true unfortunately .Latest example is diffserv aware TE > >implementation > >introduced in junos 6.2 .Only protocol so far supported to distribute ds-TE > >information is OSPF. > >Bad luck... > > Eric's point was just to say that some features may be implemented first in > one IGP or another indifferently ... this was just an example > > Lot's of us tend to think that "bleeding edge" means IS-IS because of it simplicity and flexibilility . Honestly OSPF with opaque LSA are flexible enough , and moreover OSPF provide more control and granurality when it comes to distribute information ( is-is node has to announce entire lsp , whether ospf need to announce changed opaque LSA). Still , i would vote for is-is :) regards Piotr Marecki ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
|
|