The MPLS-OPS Archive

[Spice Sylvia <falsesylvia@yahoo.co.uk>]

i guess you meant "traffic shapping"?

Actually I meant "commited bit rate".

"McCallum, Robert" <robert.mccallum@thus.net> wrote:

> >Though another interesting thing I would like to add to your >question is this:
> >Forget the bit rate, let us make it as granualar as we can. >How do we do CBR so that we have "minimum buffering" at the >VPLS /L2VPN edge devices?
>
> Use CAR??(rate-limiting/policing).
>
>
> Robert McCallum
> CCIE #8757 R&S
> 01415663448
> 07818002241 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spice Sylvia [mailto:falsesylvia@yahoo.co.uk] 
> Sent: 23 March 2004 22:24
> To: Luis Manuel Antunes dos Santos; MPLS-ops Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [MPLS-OPS]: Question about L2VPN over MPLS
>
>
> Just going a bit off topic here:
>
> The minimum bit rate is a reflection of the ability of your multiplexer/demultiplexer to be able to able to give you the "exact" bits from the frame where you want to put your data.
>
> Theoratically, I see no reason why there sh!
>  ould be
>  any limit,
>
> Assume I use a E1 and I channelize it.
>
> As long as all intermediate devices "know" that from the superframe structure, bit 1 has to go to A and bit 2 has to go to B and so on, it really does not matter.
>
> I believe the current Digital Hierachies talk in terms of DS0 which is generally wrapped around to a speed of 64kbps.
>
> Though another interesting thing I would like to add to your question is this:
> Forget the bit rate, let us make it as granualar as we can. How do we do CBR so that we have "minimum buffering" at the VPLS /L2VPN edge devices?
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now
>
> -------
> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml

---

Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends 
today! Download Messenger Now