The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2004-May> msg00026



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

RE: Reasons to deploy MPLS-TE

  • From: "Marinzulich, Matias" <Matias.Marinzulich@comsat.com.ar>
  • Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 12:54:22 -0300
  • Resent-Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 12:36:30 -0400
  • To: "'Puddinhead Wilson '" <puddinghead_wilson007@yahoo.co.uk>, "'McCallum, Robert '" <robert.mccallum@thus.net>, "''Eric Osborne' '" <eosborne@cisco.com>, "'Lavoisier J.L.Farias '" <lavoisier_farias@uol.com.br>, "'mpls-ops@mplsrc.com '" <mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
  • X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by host.secure4-hosting.net id i46G7InF027548

Wilson, THE goal of FRR is that your traffic can be switched to an
alternative path so quickly (50ms or less). You can't get these response
times with BGP/LDP!

Matias.-
  


-----Original Message-----
From: Puddinhead Wilson
To: McCallum, Robert; 'Eric Osborne'; Lavoisier J.L.Farias;
mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
Sent: 6/05/04 11:52 AM
Subject: RE: [MPLS-OPS]: Reasons to deploy MPLS-TE 

hello,
 
If *FRR* is the biggest driver of TE, then that can be achieved by using
BGP as an LDP also :) (or using any other LDP) as they would give us
multiple LSPs to the same VPNv4 prefix :)?? Will they not?
 


"McCallum, Robert" <robert.mccallum@thus.net> wrote:

Of course Eric isnt in the slightest bit biased about TE :-)

Robert McCallum 
CCIE #8757 R&S
01415663448
07818002241 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Osborne [mailto:eosborne@cisco.com] 
> Sent: 03 May 2004 15:39
> To: Lavoisier J.L.Farias; mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
> Subject: Re: [MPLS-OPS]: Reasons to deploy MPLS-TE 
> 
> 
> On Sat, 1 May 2004 17:47:16 -0300, Lavoisier J.L.Farias 
> wrote:
> 
> > Dear Sir,
> >
> > My name is Lavoisier Farias and I work in a Brazilian software 
> > company. I am also currently working in my thesis at the State 
> > University of Campinas (UNICAMP). I have some basic questions 
> > regarding MPLS. In Brazil, I do not know any service 
> provider that is 
> > implementing MPLS-TE in their networks(*). Hopefully there 
> exist some 
> > one that I don't know yet. So, my questions are:
> >
> > - What are the reasons to the service providers around the world 
> > deploying MPLS-TE ? Is the lack of bandwidth the main requirement ?
> 
> In my experience, fast reroute has been the biggest driver 
> for installing 
> mpls-te in a network; there are certainly large networks out 
> there using 
> it for bandwidth optimization and stats collection, but FRR 
> has been the 
> most widely talked about.
> 
> > - Is there exist some network using MPLS-VPN (2547) and MPLS-TE at 
> > the same network ?
> 
> Yes
> 
> > And final question more related to my thesis subject:
> > - Is the reoptmization feature available in Cisco Routers 
> really used 
> > into deployed MPLS-TE networks ! ?
> 
> Yes
> 
> 
> 
> eric
> 
> >
> > Regards and Thanks,
> >
> > Lavoisier José Leite Farias.
> > Network System Engineer.
> > (*) There are Traffic Engineer in some networks but since 
> they have an 
> > existing ATM network.
> >
> >
> > -------
> > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> > Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
> 
> 
> -------
> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
> 

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml


  _____  

 
<http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/mail/tagline_messenger/*http://uk.messenger.yaho
o.com> Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends
today!
<http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/mail/tagline_messenger/*http://uk.messenger.yaho
o.com/download/index.html> Download Messenger Now

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml