The MPLS-OPS Archive

["M. ELK" <elkou141061@hotmail.com>]

Robert

Appreciate if U could share the test setup :

1- For the lap , how many node's , how many's link's .
    are U using any machine to emulate the presense of several nodes's ??

2- Which option's U tune  to achieve the 10msec results .what were the 
value's set for
    those options .

3- are all the nodes from the same manufacturer .
    ( if no problem , could U pls specify the manufacturer and the box type 
)

4- is normal traffic were injected during the test ( to see the effect ) or 
just the objective
   was to test IS-IS covergence without taking the traffic load into 
consideration .

5- Could U share any paper documenting this test .

Note : i changed the subject to start a new stream .

Brgds


>From: "McCallum, Robert" <robert.mccallum@thus.net>
>To: "'Marinzulich, Matias'" <Matias.Marinzulich@comsat.com.ar>,        
>"'Puddinhead Wilson '" <puddinghead_wilson007@yahoo.co.uk>,        "''Eric 
>Osborne' '" <eosborne@cisco.com>,        "'Lavoisier J.L.Farias '" 
><lavoisier_farias@uol.com.br>,        "'mpls-ops@mplsrc.com '" 
><mpls-ops@mplsrc.com>
>Subject: RE: [MPLS-OPS]: Reasons to deploy MPLS-TE Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 
>17:39:17 +0100
>
>You are indeed correct BUT you can get these times with ISIS or OSPF.  I
>have been configuring this in our labs and I can get ISIS to wrap in under
>10ms.
>
>Robert McCallum
>CCIE #8757 R&S
>01415663448
>07818002241
>

_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml