The MPLS-OPS List Archive by author

More mpls-ops list information
Messages sorted by: [Date] [Thread] [Subject]
Current month: 2004-Sep Change month
185 messages, most recent first

=?GB2312?B?vfDU8w==?=, ddk148@avl.com.cn
- =?GB2312?B?us/X9w==?= (0) Sun, 19 Sep 2004 01:56:12 -0500

amit kumar, amit_kumar_99@yahoo.co.uk
- Video over Ethernet/ DSL (2) Wed, 1 Sep 2004 00:23:40 -0500

Kinczli Zoltán, Zoltan.Kinczli@Synergon.hu
- RE: CEF Requirements (1) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 14:04:19 -0500

Pierre-Alain François, pafr@pt.lu
- RE: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (0) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 05:25:02 -0500
- RE: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 04:17:57 -0500

Abdelhakeem Mohamed, hakeemamir@yahoo.com
- Re: L2Circuit - Cisco Juniper Interoperability (1) Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:43:16 -0500

Abhishek Mittal, ask4mpls@yahoo.com
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (0) Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:21:24 -0500
- Re: VRF design/monitoring questions (0) Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:34:47 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:30:05 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:41:37 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:24:31 -0500
- Multi languages devices (1) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 03:01:22 -0500
- Re: MPLS Advantage (0) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:30:37 -0500

Alcayaga Chavez Marcos Manuel, malcayaga@entel.cl
- RE: OSPF PE to CE Connectivity (0) Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:00:31 -0500

Alok, alokdube@hotpop.com
- Re: Why we need to go for MPLS ? (0) Fri, 24 Sep 2004 05:08:33 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (0) Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:48:50 -0500
- Re: MPLS Advantage (0) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 06:55:51 -0500

Amit Kumar-G20042, amitkumar@motorola.com
- RE: RE: MPLS Advantage (0) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 07:16:39 -0500
- RE: MPLS Advantage (1) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 04:14:01 -0500

Amos Rosenboim, r.amos@zahav.net.il
- RE: L2Circuit - Cisco Juniper Interoperability (0) Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:20:07 -0500
- RE: VRF design/monitoring questions (0) Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:02:53 -0500
- RE: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (0) Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:46:53 -0500

Antoine Bagula, bagula@cs.sun.ac.za
- RE: Re: CSPF numbers... (0) Mon, 27 Sep 2004 06:00:43 -0500

behrooz shahgholi, bshahgholigh@yahoo.com
- mpls hardware (0) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 04:55:16 -0500

Bob Arthurs, bob_arthurs@hotmail.com
- RE: IS-IS for PE-CE routing on cisco boxes with CSC (0) Sun, 5 Sep 2004 06:13:52 -0500
- RE: IS-IS for PE-CE routing on cisco boxes with CSC (0) Sat, 4 Sep 2004 08:25:25 -0500
- IS-IS for PE-CE routing on cisco boxes with CSC (1) Sat, 4 Sep 2004 05:41:13 -0500

Carlson Per, Per.Carlson@banetele.com
- RE: MPLS Routers (0) Mon, 6 Sep 2004 08:35:16 -0500
- RE: Difference between MPLS VRF-Lite Feature and Full PE VRF Feature (0) Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:42:49 -0500

Chen Guici, gcchen@utstar.com
- About PWE3 and L2VPN (0) Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:15:54 -0500

Chidambaram, cperiyak@cisco.com
- Re: Why do ATM switches use ordered label distribution only? (0) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 07:49:56 -0500

Clark, Anthony, anthony.clark@frontiercorp.com
- RE: CEF Requirements (1) Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:08:26 -0500

David Carver, david_a_carver@hotmail.com
- RE: L2Circuit - Cisco Juniper Interoperability (1) Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:18:55 -0500
- RE: L2Circuit - Cisco Juniper Interoperability (0) Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:40:52 -0500
- RE: L2Circuit - Cisco Juniper Interoperability (0) Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:39:54 -0500

Devendra.Vyas, Devendra.Vyas@relianceinfo.com
- Re: Why we need to go for MPLS ? (0) Fri, 24 Sep 2004 21:31:38 -0500
- Re: Why we need to go for MPLS ? (2) Fri, 24 Sep 2004 06:18:49 -0500

Eric Osborne, eosborne@cisco.com
- Re: MPLS Advantage (0) Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:53:18 -0500
- Re: CEF Requirements (0) Wed, 8 Sep 2004 07:21:26 -0500
- Re: Fwd: RE: CEF Requirements (0) Wed, 8 Sep 2004 07:19:51 -0500

Frazer, Andrew non Unisys, Andrew.Frazer@nz.unisys.com
- RE: Re: Layer 2 MPLS VPN (0) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 23:35:06 -0500
- RE: Re: Layer 2 MPLS VPN (2) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:38:40 -0500
- RE: IS-IS for PE-CE routing on cisco boxes with CSC (0) Sun, 5 Sep 2004 05:13:06 -0500
- RE: IS-IS for PE-CE routing on cisco boxes with CSC (0) Sat, 4 Sep 2004 06:05:23 -0500

Garry Glendown, garry@regio.net
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (2) Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:43:15 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:28:41 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Tue, 21 Sep 2004 01:52:45 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (2) Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:43:07 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (2) Sat, 18 Sep 2004 13:47:42 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 08:20:01 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:10:03 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:08:21 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (3) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:04:26 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (0) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:32:54 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 05:52:31 -0500
- IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 03:06:16 -0500
- Introduction to MPLS? (0) Tue, 14 Sep 2004 04:11:42 -0500

georgemiller75, georgemiller75@excite.com
- PLEASE HELP ME (0) Sun, 19 Sep 2004 14:11:44 -0500

Gupta, Shailendra, Shailendra.Gupta@hk.mci.com
- RE: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:01:20 -0500
- RE: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 04:50:07 -0500
- RE: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (0) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 03:37:37 -0500
- RE: MPLS Advantage (0) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:03:25 -0500

Howell, Ronald W \(Ron\), RTSLS, ronhowell@att.com
- RE: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (0) Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:09:21 -0500

Ian, ipotts@msbx.net
- Re: Why do ATM switches use ordered label distribution only? (1) Tue, 21 Sep 2004 02:51:49 -0500
- Re: Why do ATM switches use ordered label distribution only? (1) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 10:41:50 -0500
- Why do ATM switches use ordered label distribution only? (2) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 04:47:02 -0500
- Difference between MPLS VRF-Lite Feature and Full PE VRF Feature (2) Thu, 2 Sep 2004 04:30:55 -0500

Irwin Lazar, ILazar@burtongroup.com
- MPLScon Call For Presentations (1) Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:36:44 -0500
- FW: MPLScon 2004 Conference Proceedings (0) Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:38:21 -0500
- Re: CEF Requirements (0) Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:17:48 -0500

Jack.W.Parks, Jack.W.Parks@alltel.com
- RE: L2Circuit - Cisco Juniper Interoperability (0) Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:42:22 -0500
- RE: Re: Layer 2 MPLS VPN (0) Wed, 8 Sep 2004 08:08:19 -0500

James Allen, jamallen@gblx.net
- Re: MPLS Advantage (0) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:09:51 -0500

jerome.law, jerome.law@bt.com
- RE: Diff serv or Int serv on MPLS ? (1) Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:58:37 -0500

Jon Lewis, jlewis@lewis.org
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (0) Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:47:16 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (0) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 21:37:02 -0500

JULIANA, julmaneti@netscape.net
- From Miss Juliana (0) Sun, 26 Sep 2004 22:16:32 -0500

Kevin Pierpoint, kevin_pierpoint@oxfordcorp.com
- Routing protocol contract job (0) Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:47:30 -0500

Khan, Amjad, akhan@flagtelecom.com
- RE: Cisco's DPT technology (1) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 03:44:21 -0500
- RE: CEF Requirements (0) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 02:34:25 -0500

Krishna Gutti, krishnakishorg@yahoo.com
- Impact of MPLS backbone on choosing WLAN solution (1) Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:08:36 -0500

Kumar S, ps2kumar@yahoo.com
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (1) Mon, 20 Sep 2004 03:16:41 -0500

Lakhpat Bhandari, lakhpat_s_bhandari@sifycorp.com
- Why we need to go for MPLS ? (1) Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:52:15 -0500

M.V. Padmini, padmini@genie.iitd.ernet.in
- Re: Why we need to go for MPLS ? (0) Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:30:35 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (0) Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:57:22 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (1) Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:06:39 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (0) Sat, 18 Sep 2004 21:09:52 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (2) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:49:28 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (1) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:49:15 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (0) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:06:23 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (0) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:51:04 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (2) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:32:41 -0500
- Linux implementation of MPLS (2) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:29:57 -0500
- Re: MPLS Advantage (1) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 01:38:58 -0500
- MPLS Advantage (2) Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:26:57 -0500
- Comparitive advantages (0) Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:26:52 -0500
- Re: Re: Layer 2 MPLS VPN (0) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 13:08:40 -0500
- RE: MPLS Routers (0) Fri, 3 Sep 2004 22:37:02 -0500
- RE: MPLS Routers (1) Thu, 2 Sep 2004 21:43:44 -0500
- MPLS Routers (0) Thu, 2 Sep 2004 11:54:21 -0500
- Diff serv or Int serv on MPLS ? (0) Thu, 2 Sep 2004 07:24:08 -0500
- Re: Difference between MPLS VRF-Lite Feature and Full PE VRF Feature (1) Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:54:40 -0500

maher adib, maher@pd.jaring.my
- EIGRP Load Balance PE-CE (1) Fri, 10 Sep 2004 02:58:14 -0500

Manoj koshti, manoj_koshti@yahoo.com
- RE: MPLS Routers (1) Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:19:05 -0500

mariaaremoud, mariaaremoud@handbag.com
- WINNING NOTIFICATION/FINAL AWARD. (0) Sat, 18 Sep 2004 05:52:47 -0500

Mat.e.Hobbis, Mat.e.Hobbis@alcatel.co.uk
- Re: IS-IS for PE-CE routing on cisco boxes with CSC (0) Sat, 4 Sep 2004 07:09:18 -0500

McCallum, Robert, robert.mccallum@thus.net
- RE: IS-IS for PE-CE routing on cisco boxes with CSC (0) Sun, 5 Sep 2004 04:38:50 -0500

mohd irwan, mplsvpn2004@yahoo.com
- Re: Layer 2 MPLS VPN (2) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 10:07:29 -0500

Morris, Stephen, Stephen.Morris@marconi.com
- RE: Re: MPLS Advantage (0) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 07:20:25 -0500

Mostazir Rahman, mostazir@yahoo.com
- Re: RE: [mpls] MPLS with VRRP (0) Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:35:06 -0500
- Re: Multi languages devices (0) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:12:35 -0500

mpls guy, mplsguy@gmail.com
- Re: CSPF numbers... (1) Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:43:04 -0500
- CSPF numbers... (1) Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:56:41 -0500

MRS,SUSAN SHABANGU, mrs_susan@techemail.com
- FROM DEPUTY MINISTER (0) Sat, 4 Sep 2004 02:20:45 -0500

Munagala, Ramana V, ALABS, rum@att.com
- RE: MPLS Routers (1) Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:47:23 -0500

Nathan, paranoia@Phreaker.net
- Re: Stumped on a tag-distribution problem (PE-PE-PE?) (0) Thu, 9 Sep 2004 06:51:41 -0500
- Re: Stumped on a tag-distribution problem (PE-PE-PE?) (1) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 18:23:00 -0500
- Re: Stumped on a tag-distribution problem (PE-PE-PE?) (0) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:20:50 -0500

Nic McCartney, nic@gblx.net
- RE: FW: single vc to multi-vc bundling (0) Fri, 10 Sep 2004 04:16:46 -0500
- FW: single vc to multi-vc bundling (1) Thu, 2 Sep 2004 06:32:48 -0500

Otto Kreiter, Otto.Kreiter@dante.org.uk
- Re: layer 2 mpls vpns (question) (0) Mon, 6 Sep 2004 05:16:02 -0500
- Re: layer 2 mpls vpns (question) (0) Mon, 6 Sep 2004 04:11:34 -0500

PATRICK TAMA, patam@zwallet.com
- SOLICITATION FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE (0) Thu, 2 Sep 2004 15:26:43 -0500

Pelle, ml@carlson.homeunix.net
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:16:30 -0500

Per Carlson, ml@carlson.homeunix.net
- Re: VRF design/monitoring questions (0) Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:41:09 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (0) Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:44:54 -0500

Quinton Coelho, quintonc@webmail.co.za
- OSPF PE to CE Connectivity (0) Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:52:04 -0500

Rajiv Asati, rajiva@cisco.com
- Re: EIGRP Load Balance PE-CE (0) Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:09:14 -0500
- Re: Stumped on a tag-distribution problem (PE-PE-PE?) (1) Wed, 8 Sep 2004 12:44:12 -0500

Ramesh Babu Jayachandran, rameshbabu_j@infosys.com
- RE: Why we need to go for MPLS ? (0) Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:04:49 -0500

Raptor Communications, raptorc@comcast.net
- RE: Video over Ethernet/ DSL (0) Wed, 1 Sep 2004 01:18:56 -0500

Ravindra Botkar, ravibotkar@yahoo.com
- Re: Why do ATM switches use ordered label distribution only? (0) Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:25:35 -0500
- Re: Why do ATM switches use ordered label distribution only? (1) Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:50:28 -0500
- RE: Cisco's DPT technology (0) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 23:54:05 -0500
- Re: Why do ATM switches use ordered label distribution only? (1) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 06:37:45 -0500
- Cisco's DPT technology (1) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 02:15:49 -0500

Roger Clark Williams, rogwilli@cisco.com
- Fwd: RE: CEF Requirements (1) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 13:57:28 -0500

SAID LANRE, lagoslife32@yahoo.com
- MPLS based VPN simulation (0) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:18:45 -0500
- VPN MPLS simulation (0) Thu, 9 Sep 2004 15:37:48 -0500

singarayan babu, sbabu_psgbits@rediffmail.com
- Re: Re: MPLS Advantage (1) Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:58:22 -0500

Spice Sylvia, falsesylvia@yahoo.co.uk
- has anyone seen this patent? (0) Wed, 29 Sep 2004 04:11:30 -0500
- end to end minimal cost (0) Tue, 21 Sep 2004 03:53:22 -0500

SR, StudentResearcher@gmail.com
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (2) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:19:00 -0500
- Re: MPLS Advantage (2) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:27:20 -0500

sthaug, sthaug@nethelp.no
- RE: L2Circuit - Cisco Juniper Interoperability (0) Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:36:04 -0500
- Re: L2Circuit - Cisco Juniper Interoperability (0) Thu, 30 Sep 2004 04:07:41 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (0) Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:04:19 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:12:39 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:25:33 -0500
- Re: IP Routing problem after enabling MPLS? (1) Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:30:47 -0500
- Re: Re: MPLS Advantage (1) Tue, 14 Sep 2004 01:28:57 -0500
- RE: MPLS Advantage (0) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 07:21:59 -0500
- RE: MPLS Advantage (1) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 06:49:04 -0500
- Re: MPLS Advantage (0) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 03:34:04 -0500
- Re: MPLS Advantage (1) Mon, 13 Sep 2004 01:00:07 -0500
- RE: Re: Layer 2 MPLS VPN (0) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:55:53 -0500
- Re: Re: Layer 2 MPLS VPN (0) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 12:49:49 -0500
- RE: Cisco's DPT technology (0) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 12:43:01 -0500
- Re: Cisco's DPT technology (0) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 03:11:48 -0500
- Re: layer 2 mpls vpns (question) (1) Mon, 6 Sep 2004 04:38:58 -0500
- Re: IS-IS for PE-CE routing on cisco boxes with CSC (0) Sat, 4 Sep 2004 06:25:20 -0500
- Re: Difference between MPLS VRF-Lite Feature and Full PE VRFFeature (0) Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:32:58 -0500

subash thyagarajan, mailsubash@mail.com
- CEF Requirements (0) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 01:25:08 -0500

Sudeep Goyal, sudeepg@cse.iitb.ac.in
- Re: Why we need to go for MPLS ? (0) Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:04:34 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (1) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:43:18 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (1) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:07:19 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (0) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:01:52 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (0) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:27:40 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (2) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:27:37 -0500

Sundeep Singh, singh0de@ee.iitb.ac.in
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (0) Sun, 19 Sep 2004 01:35:35 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (3) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:35:04 -0500

Talasila, Rama, ALABS, rptalasila@att.com
- RE: CEF Requirements (0) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 10:42:48 -0500
- RE: Cisco's DPT technology (2) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 10:42:16 -0500

tassis, tassis@ceid.upatras.gr
- layer 2 mpls vpns (question) (2) Mon, 6 Sep 2004 03:48:30 -0500

Tracy Smith, TSmith@illinois.net
- VRF design/monitoring questions (2) Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:57:38 -0500

Vinay Bannai, bannai@pacbell.net
- Re: Re: Layer 2 MPLS VPN (0) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 17:50:14 -0500
- RE: Cisco's DPT technology (1) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 13:48:54 -0500
- RE: Cisco's DPT technology (0) Tue, 7 Sep 2004 13:31:52 -0500
- RE: Diff serv or Int serv on MPLS ? (1) Thu, 2 Sep 2004 11:24:43 -0500
- RE: Video over Ethernet/ DSL (0) Wed, 1 Sep 2004 03:55:21 -0500

vinaychandra.sham, vinaychandra.sham@wipro.com
- RE: [mpls] MPLS with VRRP (0) Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:01:01 -0500

Zartash Afzal Uzmi, zartash@lums.edu.pk
- RE: Re: CSPF numbers... (1) Sat, 25 Sep 2004 07:47:02 -0500
- RE: Re: CSPF numbers... (0) Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:37:01 -0500
- Re: Linux implementation of MPLS (0) Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:34:56 -0500
- RE: MPLS Routers (1) Fri, 3 Sep 2004 21:51:02 -0500