The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2004-Sep> msg00111



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: Linux implementation of MPLS

  • From: Sudeep Goyal <sudeepg@cse.iitb.ac.in>
  • Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 22:38:02 +0530 (IST)
  • cc: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
  • Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:30:44 -0400
  • X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.22-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(10.105.1.11):. Processed in 0.455307 secs Process 1620)
  • X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: sudeepg@cse.iitb.ac.in via jeeves.cse.iitb.ac.in

Adding more to the explaination, I gave earlier, I think the notion 
of labelspaces would be extremely useful (and maybe essential too) for 
"aggregation" of individual mpls flows in the network. Here we would 
need to group the flows together which would want the similar treatment.
sudeep


On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Sudeep Goyal wrote:

> Hi Padmini,
> We are also in the process of creating a MPLS test-bed in IITB. I guess the 
> notion of lablespace is to identify the interface that the labels come from 
> (as you have rightly said), but this concept is useful in processing at the 
> hop on the basis of interfaces that it come from, rather than trying and 
> identifying each and individual labels and then processing. Labelspaces can 
> make some processing fast.
>
> As far as a small test-bed is considered, it doesn't make a difference to 
> use or not to use labelspaces.
>
> I have successfully traversed ping packets using MPLS on my test-bed. But 
> ssh and other application packets seem not to work as of now. Lets see. 
> Efforts are on :)
>
> ciao,
> Sudeep
>
>
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, M.V. Padmini wrote:
>
>> 
>> We are in the process of implementing a Test bed for MPLS using linux
>> boxes.  Having gone through the mplsadm literature, they seem to be using
>> two parameters (label, labelspace) to be associated with each Interface
>> for an FEC.  The labelspace is supposed to identify the interface (from
>> which it came) where the labels could be same (labels coming from
>> different interfaces).
>> 
>> Is there a need to do this?  If you enforce the uniqueness of the label
>> wrt to a FEC, dont u think that there is no requirement for a labelspace.
>> Am i missing something?
>> 
>> Thanks in advance.
>> 
>> 
>>> Abhishek Mittal wrote:
>>>> 6> Fix up the MTU size
>>> 
>>> After upgrading to a newer IOS on the Catalyst yesterday, I just added
>>> MPLS IP to the 12k router again --- works fine now (with 1512 as MTU on
>>> all used interfaces) ...
>>> 
>>> -gg
>>> 
>>> -------
>>> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
>>> Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
>> 
>> 
>> ____________________________________________
>> ERNET Project
>> Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering
>> IIT Delhi
>> New Delhi - 110 016
>> 
>> Phone: +(91)-11-2659 6009
>> 
>> 
>> -------
>> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
>> Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
>> 
>
>

-- 

When a great leader's work is done, people say "we did it ourselves".
-Tao

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml