The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Re: Re: : Multi-vendor in MPLS domain
Dear all, You can find HUWEI-CISCO test and configs at http://195.7.8.220/~vlad/ar_series.pdf I've made this test last year in september to an operator in Europe .You can find there mpls related test. This test is only for mid and low-end routers. For backbone/core routers i will post it later. I hope i can put some configs also for Huawei-Juniper interoperability Any suggetions or question plese let me know >Actually am in the same boat. I will commence interoperability testing with cisco next month. Am currently re-writing my tests and building test-beds. I would appreciate taking a look at what you have done, if you can share. >Joe > >-----Original Message----- >From: Vlad Bistea [mailto:vlad.bistea@gmail.com] >Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 8:23 AM >To: kshwan@samsung.com >Cc: 'Lyle Williams'; mpls-ops@mplsrc.com >Subject: Re: [MPLS-OPS]: Re: : Multi-vendor in MPLS domain > >Hi, >I made a interoperability test between cisco and huawe for mid-end routers. >MPLS LDP >MPLS L3VPN >MPLS L2VPN (not interoperability only H-H) >- CCC (local,remote) >- SVC >- MARTINI >- KOMPELA >If you are interested in some scenario or configs let me know > >±Ç½Ãȯ wrote: > > > >>Hi, >> >>I¡¯m going to test interoperability between Cisco¡¯s and other vender¡¯s >>for IP and MPLS. >> >>Do you have any test scenario or test results to share? >> >>-----Original Message----- >>*From:* Lyle Williams [mailto:lyle.williams@bigpond.com] >>*Sent:* Saturday, April 16, 2005 8:14 PM >>*To:* mpls-ops@mplsrc.com >>*Subject:* [MPLS-OPS]: Re: : Multi-vendor in MPLS domain >> >>I've just come back from a 2547 course where the vendor's (I won't >>name them yet) idea of what LDP "Downstream Unsolicited" was _wildly_ >>different from what I have seen from Cisco and Juniper. >> >>I've seen interoperability reports that say that (unnamed vendor's) >>2547 interworks with Cisco and Juniper, but based on what I saw last >>week I can't see that this can be so. >> >>The vendor's ISIS implementation was also crap. It wouldn't choose the >>correct route without an operator bouncing the correct outbound >>interface. So much for dynamic routing. We were allegedly working with >>production code. >> >>Don't assume that things will interwork. Don't accept test results >>from anyone you don't trust. >> >>Lyle Williams >> >>16APR05 >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >> >>Thamir, >> >>For the most part, vendor products are RFC compliant should interoperate. >> >>However, in some cases they do not. In particular, If you are running LDP >> >>pay attention to ¡°modes of operation¡± which is simply: DU vs DoD, >>Ordered vs Independent, and Conservative vs Liberal retention. >> >>Some combinations may cause abnormal behaviour in regards to label >>binding and release. >> >>Joe >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>*From:* Thamir M.Al Hammad [mailto:thammad@stc.com.sa] >>*Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2005 12:33 AM >>*To:* vishwanathan mv; mpls-ops@mplsrc.com >>*Subject:* RE: [MPLS-OPS]: Multi-vendor in MPLS domain >> >>Thanks Padmini for your prompt replay, >> >>But what services you are running? Any NGN? >> >>Do you have mix of PEs? Or mix of Ps (mix in the core)? >> >>Br, >> >>Thamir >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>*From:* vishwanathan mv [mailto:cheerfulmvp@yahoo.com] >>*Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2005 6:09 AM >>*To:* Thamir M.Al Hammad >>*Subject:* Re: [MPLS-OPS]: Multi-vendor in MPLS domain >> >>Yes of course its practical. We in India very much have this kind of >>configuration and things work fine provided you find the compatible >>routers. >> >>- Padmini >> >>*/"Thamir M.Al Hammad" <thammad@stc.com.sa>/* wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I want to know your opinion regarding running MPLS from >> multi-vendors, is it practical? I mean the PE from vendor and the >> P from other vendor or mix of PEs and Ps from different vendors? >> Specially, in NGN environment where no doubt about TE, QoS, L2VPN >> & multicasting. >> >> I am afraid about this because I think any of these technologies >> still draft in IETF and there are different philosophies from >> different vendors. >> >> Do you know any case which successful or failed? Any white paper? >> What is the possible risk? >> >> Br, >> >> Thamir Alhammad >> >> Disclaimer: The information in this email and in any files >> transmitted with it, >> is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential >> and/or privileged material. >> Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you >> receive this in error, >> please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from >> any computer. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or >> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is >> strictly prohibited. >> Statement and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the >> sender, and do not >> necessarily reflect those of STC. >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>Do you Yahoo!? >>Make Yahoo! your home page >> >>Disclaimer: The information in this email and in any files transmitted >>with it, >>is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or >>privileged material. >>Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you receive >>this in error, >>please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any >>computer. >>If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>distribution or >>any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is strictly >>prohibited. >>Statement and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the >>sender, and do not >>necessarily reflect those of STC. >> >> >> > >------- >The MPLS-OPS Mailing List >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml >Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml > >MPLScon 2005 - May 16-19, NYC, NY >http://www.mplscon.com/ > > > > > ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml MPLScon 2005 - May 16-19, NYC, NY http://www.mplscon.com/
|
|