The MPLS-OPS Archive

[Rajesh Pandey <mrraj_it@yahoo.com>]

Hi Alok,

As per my understanding the remote peer need to have a
unique key to identify or distinguish each and every
VPLS instance running on that. This key may be based
on the customer ID, or VLAN or any other parameter
corresponding that particular FEC. This internally can
map to vc-id for the FEC. Here if you want to bundle
multiple VPLS instance you can group them for a
particular vc-id or you can use the group-id field for
the same. If you don't bind them with a particular
VC-id it is as good as having multiple FECs so it will
distribute multiple labels FECs.

Regards,

Rajesh  
--- Alok <alokdube@hotpop.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Let me clarify my question,
> 
> I am saying I have a link in between node A and B.
> 
> All I care about is sending data between A and B.
> 
> All my circuits are signalled. Not PVCs, RSVP LSPs
> signalled from say CPEs.
> 
> Why should on not advertise aggregate bandwidth of
> the link so that CSPF can
> look at the whole picture of the link and decide how
> to setup the LSPs ?
> 
> -thanks
> Alok
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Khan, Amjad" <akhan@flagtelecom.com>
> To: "'Alok'" <alokdube@hotpop.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 3:53 PM
> Subject: RE: [MPLS-OPS]: a question
> 
> 
> > Alok,
> > Each Vc has a separate IP addressing? If so, then
> each VC will have a
> > separate end-to-end LSP. So you can't bundle them.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Amjad
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alok [mailto:alokdube@hotpop.com]
> > Sent: 24 February 2005 13:47
> > To: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
> > Subject: [MPLS-OPS]: a question
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I have a link between 2 nodes A and B.
> > The link can be further split into 10 different
> sub component links, vcs
> but
> > they are between the same nodes.
> >
> > For CSPF computation, does it serve a purpose to
> advertise each of these
> > links individually rather than a bundle?
> >
> > finally the capacity between 2 links is limited by
> the baud rate of the
> > wire. So why are they individually advertised?
> >
> > -thanks
> > Alok
> >
> >
> > -------
> > The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: 
> http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> > Archive:
> http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
> >
> >
> >
>
**********************************************************************
> > This e-mail message is confidential and is
> intended only for the use of
> the
> > individual or entity named above and contains
> information which is or may
> be
> > confidential, non-public or legally privileged.
> Any dissemination or
> > distribution of this message other than to its
> intended recipient is
> > strictly prohibited. You should not copy it or use
> it for any purpose nor
> disclose
> > the contents to any other person. If you have
> received this message in
> error, please
> > notify us by email to postmaster@flagtelecom.com
> immediately and delete
> the
> > original message and all copies from all locations
> in your computer
> systems.
> >
> >
> > This e-mail has been swept by Mailsweeper TM for
> viruses. However, FLAG
> > Telecom cannot accept liability for any damage
> which you may sustain as a
> > result of software viruses.
> >
>
**********************************************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This message has been scanned for viruses by
> MailControl -
> www.mailcontrol.com
> 
> 
> -------
> The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: 
> http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
> Archive:
> http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml