The MPLS-OPS Archive

[Puddinhead Wilson <puddinghead_wilson007@yahoo.co.uk>]

The same for GRE too, even if IP supports fragment and
offset.

 --- Puddinhead Wilson
<puddinghead_wilson007@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: 
> Unless it can be done without label stacking,it
> seems
> to me that it is pointless persuing this.
> You would run into MTU issues as you keep stacking
> unecmp/ecmp inside unecmp, nested LSPs.
> 
> I would request someone on the mailing list to
> please
> find a solution to Label stacking and reduce the
> nightmare on network provisioning before persuing
> these ideas.
> 
>  --- Neil Fernandes <neil_fernandok@hotmail.com>
> wrote: 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I have some questions on TE deplpyment on Cisco
> > equipment..I am trying to
> > understand on whether un-equal cost load-balancing
> > is possible when using
> > multiple TE tunnels between "P" routers. If so how
> > does the load
> > distribution happen. My question is, If I have two
> > paths with un-equal costs
> > from source A to Source B, Can I achieve un-equal
> > cost load-balancing and
> > also is it possible to control to traffic
> > distribution ratios?..Can I use
> > "auto-route-announce" for achieving the same..Some
> > sample configs will be of
> > great help...
> > 
> > TIA
> > 
> > Neil
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 	
> 	
> 		
>
___________________________________________________________
> 
> ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even
> more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>  


	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml