The MPLS-OPS Archive

[Puddinhead Wilson <puddinghead_wilson007@yahoo.co.uk>]

Unless it can be done without label stacking,it seems
to me that it is pointless persuing this.
You would run into MTU issues as you keep stacking
unecmp/ecmp inside unecmp, nested LSPs.

I would request someone on the mailing list to please
find a solution to Label stacking and reduce the
nightmare on network provisioning before persuing
these ideas.

 --- Neil Fernandes <neil_fernandok@hotmail.com>
wrote: 
> Hello,
> 
> I have some questions on TE deplpyment on Cisco
> equipment..I am trying to
> understand on whether un-equal cost load-balancing
> is possible when using
> multiple TE tunnels between "P" routers. If so how
> does the load
> distribution happen. My question is, If I have two
> paths with un-equal costs
> from source A to Source B, Can I achieve un-equal
> cost load-balancing and
> also is it possible to control to traffic
> distribution ratios?..Can I use
> "auto-route-announce" for achieving the same..Some
> sample configs will be of
> great help...
> 
> TIA
> 
> Neil
> 
> 


	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml