The MPLS-OPS Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Newbie Questions
Hi, I am quite new to MPLS and have some questions on the FAQ on this website and the RFC3031 that might sound stupid to you, but I couldn't answer these for myself. A. LSPs The FAQ gives an example of a LSP as follows (4f): <http://www.mplsrc.com/faq2.shtml#MPLS Components> |------| 1 1 |-----| | R1 |--\ /---| R5 | |------| \ 2 2 2 / |-----| \|------| |-----| |-----| / | R2 |---| R3 |---| R4 |/ |------| |-----| |-----| It states that we have two LSPs: R1-R5, and R2-R3-R4. According to the formal description of the RFC3031 (section 1.15), a LSP is defined as follows (I quote the corresponding section directly): "In other words, we can speak of the level m LSP for Packet P as the sequence of routers: 1. which begins with an LSR (an "LSP Ingress") that pushes on a level m label, 2. all of whose intermediate LSRs make their forwarding decision by label Switching on a level m label, 3. which ends (at an "LSP Egress") when a forwarding decision is made by label Switching on a level m-k label, where k>0, or when a forwarding decision is made by "ordinary", non-MPLS forwarding procedures." According to my interpretation of the above, the R2-R3-R4 path should start at R1 and finish at R5, as R1 is the LSR that "pushes on a level m label" (m=2, requirement 1), and R5 is the LSR where "a forwarding decision is made by label switching on a level m-k label" (requirement 3). Did I get this wrong in some way? B. k > 0 This leads me to my next question: A mentioned above, the LSP ends when a forwarding decision is based on a m-k level label, whereas k>0. As far as I understand, k should be always 1, which still satisfies the condition of k>0, but in which situations can k be 2, 3 or whatever? C. Same label for different FECs at one LSR The RFC3031 (3.1) states that a LSR may only accept the same label for different FECs from different routers, if it can tell from which router the packet came (so far so good). Is there any advantage in doing so (apart from saving label values) and is there any implementation out there that uses it in this way? To me, it just adds avoidable complexity... D. FEC-to-NHLFE Map (FTN) I was wondering if there is any use for the FTN other than in MPLS Ingress LSRs? Or, need/have interior LSR a FTN at all? Feedback and clarification on any of these issues would be appreciated. Thanks for your help! Regards, Andreas ------- The MPLS-OPS Mailing List Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml MPLScon 2005 - May 16-19, NYC, NY http://www.mplscon.com/
|
|