The MPLS-OPS Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS-OPS Archive>month:2005-May> msg00034



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Re: Addressing PE/ CE Links - 2547

  • From: "M. ELK" <elkou141061@hotmail.com>
  • Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 14:14:38 +0000
  • Resent-Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 10:36:57 -0400
  • X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 May 2005 14:14:38.0402 (UTC) FILETIME=[6C46B220:01C55E0F]
  • X-Originating-Email: [elkou141061@hotmail.com]
  • X-Originating-IP: [57.250.229.136]
  • X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45



>From: josmon <josmon@rigozsaurus.com>
>To: mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
>Subject: Re: [MPLS-OPS]: Addressing PE/ CE Links - 2547
>Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 13:36:43 -0600
>
>On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 03:26:33PM +0100, MPLS Buchaill wrote:
> > There seems to be mixed opinion on what addressing should be applied to
> > PE-CE links for MPLS VPN. I know Jim Guichard highlighted a lot of the
> > common issues in his draft in 2003 but was wondering what practical
> > experience has shown?
> >
> >
> >
> > Just wondering what is the general experience and common practice on a 
>large
> > scale, RFC1918, customer or registered?
>
>We use address space out of our own registered blocks -- to ensure that
>we don't have any address space clashes.
>

We do the same .

brgds
>-------
>The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
>Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml
>
>MPLScon 2005 - May 16-19, NYC, NY
>http://www.mplscon.com/

_________________________________________________________________
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/

-------
The MPLS-OPS Mailing List
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:  http://www.mplsrc.com/mplsops.shtml
Archive: http://www.mplsrc.com/mpls-ops_archive.shtml