The Routing Over Large Clouds Mailing List Archive by date[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] The Hole in my proposal
In message <199502061406.JAA09568@maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com>, yakov@watson.ibm.com writes: > Joel, > > (a) is already solved in BGP-4 (and in IDRP for IPv6) -- there is an AGGREGATOR > attribute that provides all the information required by (a). > > To accommodate (b) requires minor extensions to BGP-4 -- a router, when > it peers with another router, should be able to specify to its peer the > set of destinations the router is "interested in". This set can be defined > in terms of Routing Information Filters (aka RIFs). RIFs can be passed > either at BGP-4 peer establishment time (as a set of optional parameters > in the OPEN message), or after the peering is established (via UPDATE > messages). There is a document that Curtis, Kannan Varadhan and myself > are planning to submit as an Internet Draft this week that describes RIFs, > and how they are supported in BGP-4 and IDRP. > > Yakov. Since the aggregation issue is being worked by Yakov et. al., are there other issues with the Directed ARP approach described in RFC1433? John Garrett |
|