The Routing Over Large Clouds Mailing List Archive by date[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] New title for "Re: MARS last call: packet formats (fwd)"
OK, OK, break it up you guys. The party's over: last call finished Monday. You can't discuss this subject any more unless you change the title. You'll have to find a new "Subject:" for this thread. > Yakov, > > > > on a single packet format for both NHRP and IP-MC. I would welcome more > > > comments from the group as to: > > > > > > a) whether or not this is desireable and > > > > It certainly would be nice to have this as a goal. > > > > > b) how we should get to a single format. > > > > IMHO as a first step we should settle on a single format for the > > Registration message. If other folks think this is a reasonable first > > step, then I'd like to get some feedback on whether it would be > > reasonable to use the IP-MC packet format for registering both > > multicast and unicast addresses. > > I disagree. I do not want to see different packet types etc. etc. etc. :-) Andrew ******************************************************************************** Andrew Smith TEL: +1 408 764 1574 Technology Synergy Unit FAX: +1 408 988 5525 Bay Networks, Inc. E-m: asmith@baynetworks.com Santa Clara, CA ******************************************************************************** |
|