The Routing Over Large Clouds Mailing List Archive by date[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt
Curtis, > IMO Internetwork Address Sub-Group is about as obscure as you can get. Yes - deliberately so. In MPOA we needed a term that carried absolutely no connotations of connectivity or the lack of it. This was purely a term for describing address summarisation. I think that is also the term that you are looking for. I, too, think that APR is the wrong term for what Yakov is describing - his term carries some connectivity implications with it, at least as currently defined in draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00. > .... We still need your NBMA definition. > It seems you want a term that covers the case where there is an > address prefix that covers the NBMA network exactly. I'll argue that > this is a special case of an NBMA, Agreed - for this special case it is not worth inventing a new TLA or FLA. > > Curtis > Andrew ******************************************************************************** Andrew Smith TEL: +1 408 764 1574 Technology Synergy FAX: +1 408 988 5525 Bay Networks, Inc. E-m: asmith@baynetworks.com Santa Clara, CA ********************************************************************************
|
|