The Routing Over Large Clouds Mailing List Archive by date[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] My personal take on cell switching routers
In a message dated 96-05-31 16:15:01 EDT, myjak@tridis.ist.ucf.edu (Michael Myjak) writes: >Paraphrasing, Steve said: > > ATM is just packet shredding with overheard. If you need > [mp-to-mp] connectivity, why not just use IP? its sufficient to do > the job, and there's already a protocol defined *and field > tested*. Besides, there's an entire Internet worth of "rooters" > out there to support it. In the data arena, high performance low cost packet switching is sine qua non to build a high quality, high performance internet. As packets most commonly are delivered to the same communications subnet from which they are received, my partner and I concluded in 1986 that by Amdahl's Law, the key to building a high performance computer network was the optimization of common LAN communications subnet technologies by building cheap full-bandwith LAN switches (fully-powered bridges). These LAN switches would serve in the construction of high performance switching fabric communications subnets, which would consist of collections of fully powered LAN switches and LAN segments Routers whose network interfaces were themselves fully powered LAN switches would then serve to interconnect these LAN switching fabric communications subnets into high-performance internets. I architected such a router in 1986-1987. I designed such a VLAN router in 1989-1990 (I called it the LSB [Logical SubBridge] Router -- I describe my reasoning in gory detail in ftp://hsdndev.harvard.edu/pub/ndtl/doc/{rtebridg.ps,rtebridg.ps.Z}). My VLAN router was PC magazine editor's choice in March 1993. Currently Xylan and Cisco are marketing and selling such routers. Today, ATM is a communications subnet technology that has a lot to recommend it as well as some drawbacks. If ATM becomes the communications subnet technology of choice, then the goal should be to build high performance low cost ATM communications subnets. To achieve this goal, high performance low cost ATM cell switches need to hit the market. The right way to interconnect ATM cell-switching communications subnets is to use routers whose network interfaces are themselves high performance, inexpensive ATM switches, i.e. the CSR (Cell-Switching Router). The CSR is one natural evolutionary path of the VLAN (LSB) router. An ATM SubSwitch replaces the Logical SubBridge or VLAN. The TTI VLAN router offers three possible mechanisms of path selection through the LAN switching fabric. In the CSR, ATM path selection replaces these LAN path selection mechanisms. In an internet constructed with well-architected CSRs, there are no possible conflicts between network layer and communications subnet path selection mechanisms. (I discuss this issue from the standpoint of VLAN routers in my document). NHRP is not needed. Joachim Martillo Father of the VLAN Router Grandfather of the CSR President Telford Tools, Inc. (TTI) "Garage Mechanics for the I-Way" 17 Pleasant Hill Ave. Dorchester/Mattapan, MA 02126-2813 V: 617-298-1617 F: 617-298-1745 E: Telford001@aol.com |
|