The Routing Over Large Clouds Mailing List Archive by date

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1996-Jun> msg00008



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

My personal take on cell switching routers

  • From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
  • Date: Mon, 3 Jun 96 15:48:42 JST
  • Cc: ion@nexen.com, jh@lohi.dat.tele.fi

Michael;

> multiple, (on the order of 1,000's of) overlapping IPmc groups and
> still support the mp-to-mp (real-time) connectivity required by
> distributed simulation hosts.

It seems to me that, for the distributed simulation, we only need
multiple best-effort point-to-multipoint (high-throughput) connections.

> Paraphrasing, Steve said:	
> 
> 	ATM is just packet shredding with overheard. If you need
>     [mp-to-mp] connectivity, why not just use IP?

As ATM is just packet shredding with QoS, if we need [mp-to-mp]
connectivity with QoS, for example for audio-vidual conference
with limited number of senders, just use multiple VCs. CSRs should
dynamically connect them as the set of senders changes.

							Masataka Ohta