The Routing Over Large Clouds Mailing List Archive by date[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Maybe RSVP and Q.2931, but not NHRP
> From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> > > But, as ATM large clouds do not and, in short-term, will not, exist, > NHRP is not a short- or long- term answer. I don't believe this is true for all values of 'large' and 'short-term'. In Scotland we have 4 Academic MANs based on ATM or mixed ATM/FDDI technology. Each of these has its own (IP) routing model. We are about to link them together using ATM switches and routers-on-sticks to make a large cloud in the short term. NHRP MAY help us to avoid either the obvious router bottlenecks or the administrative complexity of overlaying a mesh of IP connections over a simple ATM star topology. I say 'may' because as a lurker/hanger-on/near-layman in the ROLC arena my reaction to seeing the guts of NHRP is one of sheer horror at the complexity of it all. Yes, OK, I've seen it develop and I know why it's like that, but each time I read one of the NHRP drafts I keep thinking there MUST be a better way. Cell switching routers clearly aren't that in the short term, and aren't currently the IETF consensus about the way to go. As a network operator I have to go for what's affordable and available. Sam Wilson Network Services Division Computing Services, The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
|
|