The Routing Over Large Clouds Mailing List Archive by date

Cell Relay Retreat>List Archive>month:1996-May> msg00173



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

My personal take on cell switching routers

  • From: Grenville Armitage <gja@bellcore.com>
  • Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 16:16:00 -0400
  • cc: ion@nexen.com, gja@thumper.bellcore.com

Rajeev,

	[..]
>>The same argument also applies when the router needs to
>>map the flow into a QoS sensitive VCC (currently, it seems Ipsilon only
>>supports best effort VCCs) - the path through the CSR may not even
>>support the required QoS of the new VCC.

It is not clear this point is true in a relevant scenario. Before
it is meaningful to talk about QoS in an IP setting you have to
assume RSVP is deployed and working. You have to assume the (CS)routers
understand RSVP, can allocated resources meaningfully, and have
established VCCs to support the desired QoS (and that's a lot of
assumptions already). If the ATM paths in and out of the
CSR are already capable of supporting the RSVP-reserved QoS,
what makes you think jamming the incoming VCC into the outgoing
VCC is going to disrupt this?

cheers,
gja
_________________________________________________________________________
Grenville Armitage                               gja@thumper.bellcore.com
Bellcore, 445 South St.      http://gump.bellcore.com:8000/~gja/home.html
Morristown, NJ 07960 USA          (voice) +1 201 829 2635 {.. 2504 (fax)}